今天我阅读了《意外的情人节》这本书，书中讲述了这样一个故事：课间休息的时候，小熊妹妹和它的伙伴们正在跳绳。忽然，小熊妹妹最讨厌的比利走了过来，它跟小熊妹妹一起跳绳，比利不小心被绳子绊倒了，几个人摔做了一团。小熊妹妹正想去追比利，突然，上课铃响了，大家都回到了各自的教室。珍妮老师说：“同学们，情人节就要到了，我们要举办一场情人节派对，大家要互相赠送情人节贺卡。”“太棒了！”全班同学都欢呼了起来。小熊妹妹想：“我该给最讨厌的比利送什么样的贺卡呢？

等回到了家，小熊妹妹想：“我该给比利的贺卡上写什么？是玫瑰花是红色的，紫罗兰是蓝色的。你这样的大傻瓜是没人要的。还是水仙是黄色的，玫瑰是红色的。脑子进了水，我也不会要你的。”“你在想什么？”熊妈妈问。小熊妹妹说：“我只是在想要送什么样的情人节贺卡给比利。”熊妈妈问：“比利是你的朋友吗？”小熊妹妹说：“不是朋友，我跟他有仇。”小熊妹妹开始做贺卡了，它在贺卡上写：怪物可以是奇形怪状的。但要说最吓人的，那就非你莫属了。猜猜我是谁？

然而，当比利打开贺卡时，小熊妹妹却忘了看，因为在它收到的贺卡当中，有一张让它惊他不已，那张贺卡上挂满了爱心和鲜花，上面还写着：你愿意跟我做朋友吗？这时，比利走了过来，它说：“小熊妹妹，这是我攒了几个星期的零花钱给你买的贺卡。”小熊妹妹很惊讶，不知道该说什么，只说了一声“谢谢”。第二天学校开会，它们两个坐在了一起。

读了这个故事我学到了人虽然有坏处，但是也要看别人的好处，就像小熊妹妹和比利一样，比利最后不是变好了吗？

《情人》的读后感篇2

sons and lovers was d.h. lawrence's first major novel. his only major novel, some would say; but even readers who are out of sympathy with him, or who feel that his gifts were not really those of a novelist, have usually been happy to make a wholehearted exception in this one case.

it is a book that goes straight to the point, at the outset and at almost every subsequent stage. between them his two methods leave us in no doubt where the heart of his story is to be located.

gertrude morel is a woman of high principle, of character and refinement. her husband is a miner who can barely read and write. marrying him for passion, she is bitterly disappointed by his rough manners, his drinking, what she can only see as his weakness and irresponsibility. when the book opens, the marriage has already turned into a battlefield, and the love she has withdrawn from morel is being redirected toward the first of her children. in the previous chapters, gertrude morel is most devoted to her eldest son william. but after he dies of a skin disease, she plunges into grief. seeing william is gone, she rededicates her life to paul, and this revives her. she teaches her son art, education, and social advancement. she lives for her sons and will do anything to see them make their way in the world.

mrs. morel is terribly tired of her involvement in paul and miriam's relationship and decides to stop intervening. she knows that paul is an adult now and that there is nothing she can do to stop paul from seeing miriam. she feels that she can never forgive her son for sacrificing himself to love miriam. as it mentions above, paul has begun to realize how much his mother affects his life. her deep love for him has made her a part of himself that when he wants to break free from his mother, he is unable to get away from her. his mother is ingrained into his very soul.

thatsquo;s to say, his mother influences paul very much, and which proves to be for worse to him. when paul finds girlfriend, he always find the girl who takes after his mother, not only the out look but also in mental. but in fact he could not find such girl. so it lead to that he never willing to be bound to miriam in marriage or to clara in physical love. at last paul has begun to realize how much his mother affects his life. her deep love for him has made her a part of himself that when he wants to break free from his mother, he is unable to get away from her. his mother is ingrained into his very soul.

to sum up, paulsquo;s mother has some bad influence on him and to a large extent changes his life.

《情人》的读后感篇3

说实话，这本书的前半部分我并不看好，被冗长繁杂的文字和时间模糊的跨度折磨的丧失信心，我甚至怀疑过这本书的水准。但是反复的劝慰自己，它肯定有它的独到之处，否则也不会有如此高的成就。于是我重新整理思绪，再次进入到角色里面。才发觉，作者之所以长篇累牍的叙述家庭琐事和社会背景，是为了迎合她的内心感受，她想让读者们知道，她所有的爱恨情仇，都是基于她的生活背景。如果认识原来的我，就会原谅现在的我。

最令人感慨的就是男女主人公之间深沉而无望的爱情，在那样的年代，他们的结合是错误的。但是，对于他们自身而言，是无比幸福而快乐的。然而，故事最终仍旧是个悲剧。世界上最遥远的距离莫过于，两个人明明相爱却不能在一起。那是怎样的一种时间和空间的惆怅和折磨呢?

这本书最精彩的地方是后半部分，作者的笔锋愈加凝练，一段段色彩凝重的自然风景把故事渲染的美丽而绝望。而男女主人公无时无刻不在承受离别的撕心裂肺和伤心欲绝。爱，不能光明正大的爱;恨，只能压制的心底。看着揪心，摸着疼，真是无尽沧桑尽在其中啊。

“我已经老了，有一天，在一处公共场所的大厅里，有一个男人向我走来。他主动介绍自己，他对我说：‘我认识你，永远记得你。那时候，你还很年轻，人人都说你妹，现在，我是特为来告诉你，对我来说，我觉得你比年轻的时候更美，那时你是年轻女人，与你那时的面貌相比，我更爱你现在备受摧残的面容。’我常常忆起这个只有我自己还能回想起而从未向别人谈及的形象。它一直在那里，在那昔日的寂静之中，令我赞叹不止。这是所有形象中最使我惬意，也是我最熟悉、最为之心荡神驰的一个形象。”

《情人》的读后感篇4

除却雨果的《巴黎圣母院》和巴尔扎克的《高老头》，记忆中很少读法国作家的作品吧，这两周抽时间读完了杜拉斯的《情人》一书，虽不甚明白，但终究还是稍有体会。正如译者所言，杜拉斯的作品是深涩难懂的，时间空间人物的转换过快，往往使得读者迷惑而不知其所言何物。

我已经老了。简单的开头，却不知承载了多少岁月的沧桑，世事的煎熬，容颜的摧残；又不知有多少的自悦自喜，心醉神迷，流连忘返，恐怕只有杜拉斯自己能够明白其中的滋味吧。冷漠的母亲，贪婪的大哥，懦弱的小哥，绝望是那么的彻底。然而，终有一天，她遇见了自己的情人，自己也不清楚到底存不存在爱情的情人，只是知道，她需要他，而他也需要她。当白日已尽，他们在一起相互取暖，相互慰藉；有时，她会莫名觉得眼前这人像是自己的父亲，但就是这样他们彼此拥有。可是后来，他们不能在一起。港口消失了，接着，陆地也消失了。航船横越大洋，她最后还是走了。再后来，经历几次结婚，生孩子，离婚；最后，他带着他的女人来到巴黎。他给她打来电话，她一听声音，就听出是他。他说：我仅仅想听听你的声音。她说：是我，你好。后来他不知道和她再说什么。故事到此为止，仅此而已，你不知还会发生什么，但那不重要了，是吧？毕竟往事已成追忆。总体来说，小说大多关于爱情、死、希望这些观念。没有爱的爱情，爱的对象便变成了“物”。“继而引出极度的痛苦，深可悲戚的情景，而运笔又偏于枯冷，激情潜于其下，悲剧内容既十分沉重又弥漫全篇，很是低沉悲伤。” ——王道乾

《情人》的读后感篇5

暑假里一个烈日炎炎的午后，我躺在床上百无聊赖，便随手翻起了玛格丽特杜拉斯的《情人》，一下子就被这本薄薄的小书深深地吸引住了。

开头是这么写的：我已经上了年纪，有一天，在一处公共场所的大厅里，有个男人朝我走过来。他在做了一番自我介绍之后对我说：“我始终认识您。大家都说您年轻的时候很漂亮，而我是想告诉您，依我看来，您现在比年轻的时候更漂亮，您从前那张少女的面孔远不如今天这副被毁坏的容颜更使我喜欢。”多么温情默默的开头，让我想起了叶芝的那首诗《当你老了》，“多少人爱你青春欢畅的时辰，爱慕你的美丽，假意或真心，只有一个人爱你那朝圣者的灵魂，爱你衰老了的脸上痛苦的皱纹”。我猜想，《情人》一定是一个无比动人的爱情故事，或许还很传奇。

怀着无比期待和激动的心情，我一口气就看完了这本书。读完之后，感觉内心特别压抑、字里行间那种悲凄感、颓靡感、孤独感令我喘不过气，杜拉斯不愧是大师，《情人》确实给人以震撼的快感。书中有两个情节给我留下了难以磨灭的印象。一个是白人姑娘透过人山人海看到自己的情人结婚的情景，四目相对时那男人眼中的孱弱与无奈和女孩眼中带着坚强和倔强的近似绝望的神情；中国有句古诗“恨不相逢未嫁时”就算相逢未嫁时有什么用呢，目睹心爱的人结婚还要什么比这更残酷和凄惶呢？！另一个情节是女孩在归国的轮渡上，看到巨轮笛声长鸣，吊板缓缓升起，拖轮启航远离岸边时，她开始饮泣了，但那是既没有眼泪，又没有声音的低泣，就连前来送行的妈妈和小哥哥都不曾发现。她伤心欲绝，也像上次一样倚船栏上，她知道情人也正在凝望自己。悲哉！我离君天涯，君隔我海角。“她突然不敢肯定她没爱过这个男人，没有这种她没有见过的爱情，因为这爱情已经在历史中消逝，就象流水消失在沙漠里一样。可现在，也仅仅是现在，当这首乐曲撒遍大海的时候，她才重新发现这种业已消逝的爱情。”无论女孩以前如何否定她爱那个男人，此情此景下，分别在即，她也只能放纵自己低低的啜泣，那是何等的无望阿，或许这辈子再无法缘相见吧，而她那么努力压抑的情感其实一直都在，浓郁似火般被她浇灭在心间。情极至毒呵！

这本书让我想起作家池莉的一句话：文学是一个关于绝望的故事。的确，《情人》之所以被那么多人喜欢也许就在这绝望中的爱情吧。一个贫穷的生活艰辛的白人女孩和一个中国的富家少爷在半殖民地的越南，跨越种族、跨越偏见、跨越阶层相爱了，这爱本身就是一种无望，一种对非理性的偏执与迷恋，压抑感与绝望感在书中随处可见。抛开那些炫丽的写作技巧，大量的.意识流和心理描写以及纵横交错的时空变换，我认为作品本身的感染力和吸引力还在于情感。杜拉斯写这部自传性小说时候的心境我们不得而知，可我猜想，过了那么多年已经功成名就的她却始终忘不了16岁的那段短暂而悲壮的爱情，初恋的记忆穿越时空，还停留在对一段爱情的回眸和对一个男人的怀念之中。它的爆发可以划破沉寂的长空，震惊整个世界，这该是怎样刻骨铭心的一段恋情！就像作品最后那个中国男人说“他和从前一样，仍然爱着她，说他永远无法扯断对她的爱，他将至死爱着她”，情深不寿，正因为爱得深，那种无法爱、爱不到的煎熬才来得深刻、来得长久。我认为，《情人》整本书其实就是杜拉斯在向我们讲述一个关乎绝望的故事。爱情是孤独和绝望结出来的红苹果，鲜嫩美好的外表下是绝望的毒汁在四溢阿！我读过的西方文学作品中关于爱情绝望的女性还有两个。一个是狄更斯《远大前程》中老处女郝维辛小姐，令一个是福克纳《献给艾米丽的玫瑰》中的艾米丽小姐，两位老处女都是把内心的绝望辐射到生活的其他角落，实施刻毒的爱情计划来折磨他人，而最终驯服她们的都是那比爱情更能持久、那战胜了爱情的熬煎的永恒的长眠。包括情人在内的这三部作品，的确验证了池莉的那句话，文学是一个关于绝望的故事。

很久很久以后，也许我的记忆里还会有《情人》中的一些琐碎的片段和细节，它并不像巴尔扎克和托尔斯泰的鸿篇巨制那么正统，可它的确让我思考，思考关于爱情、关于生活的那些细腻与微妙之处。

《情人》的读后感篇6

“他是个强健的、身材修长的男子，有着用不完的精力。他的脸很粗犷，具有象普通老百姓的那种粗线条；掩在那双浓密眉毛下的眼睛饱含着如此充沛的生命力，以至她不能不着迷。它们好像在舞蹈，但又仿佛被笑声的余音振颤着；他的嘴巴也一样，好像马上会爆发出胜利的笑声，但又没有笑出来。他给人以强烈的悬念感。”

他就是保罗。《儿子和情人》一书中的男主人公。d.h.劳伦斯细腻入微地叙述了他的青少年生活、与母亲的畸恋以及和米丽安、克拉拉的爱情纠葛。这本书探讨了英国下层家庭关系的复杂性。作者很注重心理描写，把保罗的思想逐步地解剖，呈现在读者面前。保罗自小受到母亲莫瑞尔太太的钟爱，但是父亲却对他不理不睬。他特别早熟，心里埋藏着对父亲的仇恨。而莫瑞尔太太则是个复杂的人物，她把对死去的长子威廉的爱移植到保罗身上。她对丈夫没有一点爱情，只是把他当作客人看待。但是她极其嫉妒次子的情人，尤其是对米丽安。因为她深知米丽安要夺走儿子的精神之爱，便千方百计地阻扰，并采取冷漠的态度。而米丽安深爱着保罗，本来是不愿意与别人分享的，但是她是个富于牺牲精神的人，一直在默默地等待。米丽安以为保罗在得到她的纯洁后会更爱她，可惜她想错了。保罗太爱他母亲莫瑞尔太太了！直到他母亲死后，他才走向了新的生活。至于克拉拉，她与保罗仅仅是肉体之恋。后来与她的丈夫复合了。

全书洋洋洒洒40万字，其间不但插入了优美的景物描写，而且作者把人物的内心活动与景物的联系写得栩栩如生，各个人物活灵活现，呼之欲出。此书被列为英国一些大学文科的必读书。

《情人》的读后感篇7

eading report of sons and lovers during my extracurricular time, i started reading sons and lovers, which was written by david herbert lawrence. he was an english novelist, poet, playwright, essayist, literary critic and painter who published as d. h. lawrence. he was born on september 11, 1885 to a miner and his wife in the small village of eastwood near nottingham, england. arthur and lydia lawrence, his parents, had a troublesome marriage from the start: his father, a miner, was content to stay on the mining grounds while his mother yearned to leave. so his childhood was dominated by poverty and friction between his parents. he was educated at nottingham high school, and won a scholarship. he worked as a clerk in a surgical appliance factory, and then for four years as a pupil-teacher. he was died in vence, france on march 2, 1930. lawrence is now valued by many as a visionary thinker and significant representative of modernism in english literature. there is a background before the author wrote this book. lawrence lived at a time when the industrial revolution was taking on the whole world, especially in great britain, which changed from agricultural society towards industrial society. and it brought all changes in national and personal lives. lawrence?s novel sons and lovers deals with lawrence?s personal experiences in the working-class environment in nottinghamshire.

sons and lovers is the third published novel of d. h. lawrence, taken by many to be his earliest masterpiece. it tells the story of paul morel, a young man and a budding artist. this autobiographical novel is a brilliant evocation of life in a working class mining community. this novel is about the life of movels. mr.morel, mrs.moel, paul, miriam and clara are the main characters in this novel. the author develops the story by portraying the relationships between these characters. but the end of the relationship is a tragedy. i divided this book into two parts. now i will introduce the first part of this book.

the refined daughter of a good old burgher family, gertrude coppard meets a rough-hewn miner at a christmas dance and falls into a whirlwind romance. but soon after her marriage to walter morel, she realizes the difficulties of living off his meager salary in a rented house. the couple fight and drift apart and walter retreats to the pub after work each day. gradually, mrs.morel?s

affections shift to her sons, beginning with the oldest, william. as a boy, william is so attached to his mother that he doesn?t enjoy the fair without her. as he grows older, he defends her against his father?s occasional violence. eventually, he leaves home for a job in london, where he begins to rise up into the middle class. he is engaged, but he detests the girl?s superficiality. he dies, and mrs. morel is heartbroken, but when william catches pneumonia, she rediscovers her love for her second son. both repulsed by and drawn to his mother, paul is afraid to leave her but wants to go out on his own, and needs to experience love. gradually, he falls into a relation ship with miriam, a farm girl who attends his church. the two take long walks and have intellectual conversations about books, but resists in, in part because his mother looks down on her.

i want to introduce the three characters of this book: mr. morel, mrs morel and miriam leviers. mr. morel is paul's rough, sensual, hard-drinking father. in many ways, he is his wife's opposite. mr. morel is from a lower-class mining family. he speaks the local dialect in contrast to his wife's refined english. he loves to drink and dance practices that mrs. morel, a strict congregationalist, considers sinful. mrs morel is one of the most formidable mothers in all of western literature. to the narrator, and perhaps to paul morel, she is both a giving, selfless nurturer of her children and a possessive tyrant. miriam leviers, paul's teenage friend and sweetheart, was modeled after lawrence's own young love, miriam is paul's devoted helpmate in his artistic and spiritual quests. although beautiful, she takes no pleasure in her physical attributes. her whole life is geared towards heaven and a mystical sense of nature.

this is the most autobiographical of all lawrence?s works as the author himself had a similar relationship with his own mother. the use of this oedipal theme is one of a number of freudian concepts he used throughout his books. like many of his works, sons and lovers was criticized when first published for obscenity and one publisher called it the dirtiest book he had ever read, but compared to his later works it is quite constrained.

there are three females that paul had loved. the first person is his mother. paul is afraid to leave her but wants to go out on his own, and experience love. then, it is miriam, whom is a farm girl. they have intellectual conversations about books in the nature. at last, paul meets clara dawes, who has separated

from her husband, paul get physical satisfaction from her.

i want to show my opinions about the love between paul and miriam.miriam leviers, paul's teenage friend and sweetheart, was modeled after lawrence's own young love. she is romantic in her soul but timid and sensitive in appearance. miriam is paul's devoted helpmate in his artistic and spiritual quests. although beautiful, she takes no pleasure in her physical attributes. her whole life is geared towards heaven and a mystical sense of nature. miriam is paul?s first lover. miriam loves paul, but she can?t admit to and has no courage to love. when she loves paul, she only wants to dominate his mind, then to catch paul?s whole soul. but paul knows that miriam only loves his soul and wants to posses him. in this book, there is a dialogue between them which paul rejected miriam. miriam said: you had said that we belong to each other. i was young. i did belong to my mother and now she is died. i don?t want to live again with you, not even with you. i?m sure i?ll never find one as good as you, but perhaps i understand at last what the mean to live, said paul. for paul, mother?s love makes him unhappy, while miriam seems like his mother as both want to control his soul. of course, he will against that form of love as he thinks that?s not love and wants to escape from this spiritual love. i think the love was failed because of miriam?s possession.

then, i?d like to compare lawrence as a combination of both william and paul. as william, he was a man who grew in such family and had a strong will to break the shackles of his class. william was gifted, he was successful in both his academy work and interpersonal relational, and he escaped from his lamentable family to london. the mentality of william just like lawrence purred his feel to this character subconsciously: the disgust of his father, admiration of mother, struggle to free himself from the mournful family. all these characteristics are based on author himself experience. of course, these stuffs also connected with the society at that time, which class you came from can be the first to affect who you were or how you were, in order to change your social status, the post important was to change the class you belonged to. all these ideology created both lawrence and his william.

at the moment, it?s clear that paul?s oedipus complex and reasons. actually paul has not become a normal adult by getting over some problems like

other children. that is not only determined by his mother?s abnormal maternity. the reasons are in many ways, some comes from the parents; some comes from his sisters and brothers, some even from the society, the mechanical civilization, which leads to the family tragedy and distortion of personality.

《情人》的读后感篇8

d.h.lawrence and his sons and lovers sons and lovers was regarded as his autobiography, actually, i strongly agree with this view. isquo;d like to compare the novel with lawrence in the following three aspects: family background, the shackle of class and oedipus complex. first is the background. as to d.h.lawrence, he was born in a family which his father was a miner who hardly received any education, instead of his mother with well education and her personal ideal of the politics or philosophy. compared with sons and lovers, the herosquo;s family is similar with lawrencesquo;s-----vulgar father, well-educated mother. the father who works as a miner, nothing like to do but drinking, his words usually can be rude no matter what to his wife or his children;

the mother, a well educated lady, fell in love with mr. morels accidently, but the reality finally defeated her romance, the humble and mediocre life struck her dream of being honorable. all in all, these situations are reflection of lawrencesquo;s life, not only the characteristics of parents but also the surroundings, like working in the mine, living a strapped life and so on. secondly, to a certain degree, isquo;d like to compare lawrence as a combination of both william and paul (the eldest son and younger son in the novel). as william, he was a man who grew in such family and had a strong will to break the shackles of his class. william was gifted, he was successful in both his academy work and interpersonal relationship, and he escaped from his lamentable family to london. the mentality of william just like lawrencesquo;s that a canary in the cage who tried to get away to the broad sky. so in this aspect, i think lawrence purred his feel to this character subconsciously: the disgust of his father, admiration of his mother, struggle to free himself from the mournful family. all these characteristics are based on author himself experience. of course, these stuffs also connected with the society at that time, which class you came from can be the first to affect who you were or how you were, in order to change your social status, the most important was to change the class you belonged to. all these ideology created both lawrence and his william. last but not the least i want to point out is oedipus complex which showing explicitly in the novel, peculiarly on paul, the younger son who faced the difficulty when his love countered to miss miriam, the deeply love towards his mother----mrs. morel, which was clanged his tightly. he can find his true love until one he emancipated himself from his mothersquo;s love. paul would be entangled with dilemma every time when he stayed with miriam;

he could not love her from heart as his will and another hand, he cansquo;t abandon his love to his mother. as a generally thought, mrs. morel was regarded as lawrencesquo;s mother----lydia, miss miriam was recognized as lawrencesquo;s first girlfriend----jessie. in this point, lawrence endowed his oedipus complex on his paul, in the novel, the agonized and miserable love was showed incisively and vividly. from all above, we can see distinctly, the novel----- sons and lovers is an autobiography of lawrence himself, not only on the background of the society, family, but also the personality of the leading character. from the novel, we can have a glimpse of lawrencesquo;s private life;

a talent suffered from his anguished and miserable love, and shackle of class.

《情人》的读后感8篇相关文章：